Bringing Some Life to the Debate

By Jan Greene

The folks at Consumers Union, who publish Consumer Reports Health, have taken their show on the road this summer to bring attention to the many and varied flaws in the U.S. healthcare system. You can track their progress on their Cover America Tour site. Ultimately, the three young campaigners in an RV-shtick is part of Consumers Union’s healthcare reform lobbying, preparation for when a new president shows up in the White House, possibly ready to make some major changes.

Meanwhile, Consumer Reports Health has done some work of interest to consumers with inadequate coverage. For instance, the article 7 ways to make the most of your health plan has some solid advice for people with insurance. Most valuable is a form they’ve created (the link is in the “7 ways” article) that makes it easy to analyze your health plan’s benefits; there’s also a list of questions to ask about your health plan.

The Consumer Reports Health website has a lot of information open to non-subscribers, which is nice. One feature is a hospital comparison tool that is based on research about how care differs from one region of the country to another, and from one hospital to another. So I plugged in my area, which is Alameda County, California, and found a wide range of “aggressiveness” in care by the eight hospitals that popped up, along with average doctor fees. This refers to whether the doctors are conservative in carrying out expensive tests and procedures or whether they go all-out. Research is showing that more care is not necessarily better, and that sometimes unnecessary testing can be bad for us. Still, if I was going into the hospital for an operation I’m not sure I could bring myself to choose the conservative hospital, for fear that they’d hold back something I’d need. That’s not likely if I choose physicians who are experienced and I trust. In any event, the CRH hospital comparison tool is probably not something you’d depend on for a choice, but it’s one more thing to consider. And good for Consumer Reports for expanding the universe of information available to consumers.

 

Interesting Times

By Jan Greene

Wasn't that some culture's curse — may you live in interesting times? Well, in healthcare we're smack in the middle of interesting times, and they don't want to let up.

I've been busy with work (a good thing for a freelance writer! A bad thing for a blogger!) so I've been remiss in posting. Meanwhile, lots of action to be noted:

–AHIP, the trade association for health plans, is meeting just across the bay from me this coming weekend, and proponents of single payer (government-sponsored) health coverage will be outside promoting their cause. That should be interesting…a little street theater at San Francisco's Moscone Center usually jazzes up a slow summer news day. And maybe that's the kind of energy it will take to get some kind of reform happening somewhere, somehow.

–Yet another Commonwealth Fund report following the experiences of the underinsured finds that their ranks have grown from 16 million to 25 million since 2003 — a 60 percent increase! This is interesting because people with inadequate health insurance tend to get ignored in policy discussions focused on covering more people with no insurance at all. But these folks are often employed, maybe work for themselves, are paying an insurer for "coverage" and yet face big out-of-pocket expenses anyway. The Commonwealth Fund found that 45 percent of these people have an outstanding medical debt and 53 percent of them went without needed care because of costs.

The other interesting piece of this study is its mention of the various ways that health plans are being winnowed away and not just with high deductibles (the dollars you pay before coverage kicks in). Health plan designers are finding creative ways to cut costs, and in ways that the average consumer might not notice until she trips on them — limiting the total amount the plan will pay for medical care, limiting the number of physician visits.

–The wordplay around "consumer-directed" continues to be an interesting topic of discussion. It's the flavor of the month in the healthcare industry but some consumer advocates believe the term is a palatable-sounding shield for making individuals pay more out of pocket for their care. Writing on the Health Affairs blog, Ron Cunningham, an editor at the journal, makes the the point nicely:

But the policy community understands, and pardons with an ironic wink,
the gamesmanship involved in labeling as “consumer-directed health
care” those recent insurance benefit redesigns that increase
deductibles and patient cost sharing. When did consumers ever stand up
and demand that they be allowed to pay more when they are sick?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch (we'll see how many of you young'uns catch that reference), I'm checking out a redesigned medical price information service provided by an outfit called change:healthcare. Its Medstimate is supposed to be new and improved and based on a wide variety of sources. We'll see if it measures up and I'll report back next time.

Hospital Prices, Part II

By Jan Greene

In our continuing quest to advance healthcare transparency, I'm seeking out websites that reveal actual prices that hospitals (and other healthcare providers) charge for their services. Nothing is ever that simple, of course; the bottom line for a hospital stay or other service is going to depend on your health plan (if you have one), the specifics of your care (a given service can vary quite a bit by the time all is said and done) and the phase of the moon. Well, maybe not that last thing. It's true, though, that a clerk in the billing office of a hospital may indeed have trouble telling you exactly what it will cost to have a baby or and MRI in their facility because there are so many variables. But if you're paying the bill, you have to start somewhere.

Some individual hospitals, hospital associations, states and others maintain lists online where you can look up this information. Many will be limited to the most common procedures and some may refer only to their specific area or facility. Once again, though, you gotta start somewhere.

Here are some sites to try:

Minnesota Hospital Association

Medicare Consumer Initiative

New Hampshire Price Point

Texas Price Point

Oregon Price Point

Wisconsin Price Point

Even Doctors are Confused

By Jan Greene

There's a really interesting column in the Wall Street Journal this week by Dr. Benjamin Brewer, who writes regularly about his experiences in the American health system. He talks about taking his daughter to an emergency room for stitches and getting a surprisingly high bill. His comments address what this blog is all about:

Nobody I know would be willing to buy gas at an unknown price, only to
find out the damage when the tab comes a month and a half later. But
between the mind-numbing complexity of health-care charges and the
reluctance of many in the health system to reveal their prices up
front, you don't have much of a choice.

Yeah, exactly. He goes on to talk about being on the other side of the billing process:

Some patients with big deductibles or health savings accounts try to
negotiate fees with me. I'm not offended, but as a family doctor in
Illinois my margins aren't that high to start with. A $65 to $85 office
call carries $45 to $50 in overhead.

This is instructive because it goes to one of my main pieces of advice: Know which medical services have a high profit margin and negotiate harder on those. It's pretty well known that primary care doctors such as family physicians aren't making a lot of money on office visits, so there's not much point in dickering their prices down much (though it's always worth asking). I'll be devoting future posts to the profitability of other common medical services.

There's an interesting string of comments after Dr. Brewer's column in the WSJ that get into a debate about how much medical services cost and what should be done about it. If you have a subscription to the WSJ you can read all about it (though someday soon the journal is rumored to become free of charge).

Some of the comments were from consumers who had tried to get pricing information before they had a medical service and were told that information is confidential. That's ridiculous. We should all ask and keep asking until hospitals, doctors' offices, labs, imaging centers and all the other parts of the system get the message that they need to evolve with the times just like consumers, whether we like it or not. It's ludicrous to think that consumers have to take the brunt of paying for more of their care without giving them the information and skills to do so. That's what we'll try to remedy, in some small way, on this blog.

Finding Hospital Prices

By Jan Greene

One of the many frustrating things about paying for healthcare these days is finding out how much you should be paying for a hospital-based service. It's completely hit-or-miss if you call a hospital's billing department and ask how much they would charge, list price, for a given procedure…maybe an elective surgery or imaging study like an MRI. You know why they can't tell you? There are a couple of reasons:
–They don't want to. Care is complicated and it's hard to predict exactly how much anesthesia or bandages or time your care might require. Giving you an inaccurate number could cause confusion later.
–They don't actually know. The healthcare "marketplace" has been screwy for so long that many hospitals don't actually know how much it costs them to provide a service and, therefore, how much they should charge an individual paying out of pocket. The vast majority of patients pay via Medicare or private insurance, which have either set rates or negotiated rates with each hospital. New high-deductible plans and HSAs that require more out-of-pocket paying are a new phenomenon, and hospitals haven't caught up.

There are a few sources emerging online that can give you hints of how much you can expect a hospital service to cost, and a few pioneering hospitals are out there offering the information for a list of major procedures.(This trend is known in health policy circles as transparency.) I'll start listing these in the resources section as I find them.

Here's one that's interesting:
www.ahd.com
This site's developer has pulled together all the hospital finance information that is publicly available through the federal government's Medicare system. Mostly the site owner sells the information to industry types, but also offers individual hospital profiles for free to anybody. So, for instance, I can find out that my local hospital charged the Medicare system on average $359 for an electrocardiogram (EKG). This is only a starting place for negotiations since Medicare pays less than private insurance rates, but at least you get a sense for what something could cost.

I'll look for some more and post them here in coming days.

Status report

By Jan Greene

Greetings. There's an interesting chicken-or-egg thing that goes into starting a blog. Do you just start writing even if nobody's out there? Or do you put together a comprehensive package and then start publicizing?

I'm guessing this is a little of both. I'm going to keep commenting on what's going on and keep adding resources to this page and keep publicizing to reach a wider audience. It'll be the chicken AND the egg approach.

Meanwhile, anybody here but us chickens?

Confidentiality Guaranteed

By Jan Greene

It occurs to me that I’ve asked folks to share the intimate details of their health and financial problems. Not everybody is willing to tell the world about the trouble they had getting their insurance company to pay for their therapy bills or hemorrhoid treatments. After all, as I remind myself regularly on this thing, everything I write here is worldwide and lasts forever.

So anyway, feel free to share your story anonymously. I promise to keep your information confidential. Just press the comment button and share away!

People are worried

By Jan Greene

This just in…California healthcare consumers are increasingly worried about being able to afford the rising cost of getting medical care. A Field poll indicated that 59 percent of voters are "very concerned" about not being able to afford the costs associated with a major illness or injury, up from 48 percent of voters in a 2006 survey.

Fifty-eight percent of the California voters told the pollsters they are "very concerned" about having to pay more out-of-pocket costs for health care, up from 40 percent in 2006.

More than half worry they could lose their coverage, and about half worry about the quality of the health services they are able to access. (These poll numbers were reported all over, but these came from a report in the Stockton Record.

Californians are probably no more prone to worry than other Americans, so I’m guessing these results reflect all Americans’ growing fear about the comprehensiveness of their healthcare coverage. All the more reason to read this blog, as we collect more resources to help people. I’ll be adding those soon, honest…I just have a lot of paying work to do right now. Stay tuned!

Yes, You’re Paying More

By Jan Greene

If it seems like you’re paying more for your healthcare, you probably are. A recent study, reported in the Washington Post, shows that Americans buying family health insurance coverage through their employers saw premiums rise 34 percent between 2001 and 2005. During that same time average family incomes rose only 3 percent. You see the problem.

Has Your Insurance Changed?

by Jan Greene

OK, let’s get things rolling here. How about some dialog about how insurance is changing these days. Many people have told me about shrinking benefits, higher deductibles and certainly higher premiums over the past few years.

I’m self-employed and buy an individual, high-deductible policy. I pay the first $2,500 of most things, though a certain amount of preventive care is exempted from that (the first several doctor visits of the year, for example.) My premium has gone from about $150 to $330 in the past two years.

How has your insurance changed?